Reader Interaction - 26-27 Sep 2006

Expressing Communication Concerns Directly to the Company Management.




26-27 September 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

I believe your thoughts are accurate and correct. I have lost confidence in Mike Pound and Scott. I no longer will give them the time of day. Anytime I called Integral, Michael had a very smart attitude. I believe their heads swelled as the price per share increased. I wish that I could somehow send a message to Bill without going thru their website. I wanted to voice my thoughts. -- In a very constructive way, of course.

I would like to tell you that I appreciate your insight and ideas.



-------------------



EB Reader,

I too wish you could speak directly to Bill Robinson (BR), if anything, to help you in strengthening your confidence in your investment, but also out of common sense of courtesy.

IMO, you should have noted that you attended the meeting at Jasper, and walked away with the feeling that he, or one of the other company leaders not only wanted, but also encouraged communication between the common shareholders and themselves.

The reality is this though. BR’s sights are set at the horizon. Yes, he is aware, and sees the material potential daily. He also sees the stock daily, but he sees this in different terms than you or I. With the material potential, he has the edge. Because his business advisors have told him of ElectriPlast’s worth in the real world--if it is as disruptive as advertised.

· To that end, the fact that JARCO did sign an agreement validates that notion/truth of that question even more.
· Secondly, he sees the stock in terms of NASDAQ potential.

Once the overall marketing plan reaches that peak, then the stock prices will fall into place, stronger hands--like Mutual and Hedge Fund managers will readily bulk purchase the company stock, and these entities are not likely to day-trade for effect, or sell their stocks out of fear/controversy, or rumor-based-confusion.

Why I note that last--for the simple reason--these institutions are like banks--they are banks in a sense. Before you, or I can get a business loan, we must have a business-plan in hand. Before we purchase a home, we must have collateral or a co-signer available. For Mutual and other Fund managers, they get to conduct hands on evaluation of the product, they test the market, and analyze and scrutinize for fault, or loss--before they invest. Rarely do these Fund managers invest in something that is not on a major market, and rarely do they invest in penny stocks.

That Worthington did was telling at the time they choose to invest. They were betting on the product, and possibly the company, but the IP material must have truly impressed them to encourage their investment.

The point I am getting to--BR's sights could be far beyond this, or any false blips on the radar. He is more than likely looking to the incarnation of day when all those patents become real, and the profit potential for each is used to multiply the bottom line.

The complaints you have today have to be about something larger than a 30-day pps (price per share) spread. If the process of communication is broken, you have to be specific to address that, and come up with a solution. If Michael Pound is telling misleading stories out of school, then that needs to be addressed up front and highlighted for effect. If it is his attitude, then realize you are not the first individual he’s spoken to in the day, or week with the same questions, or the same concerns. It is human nature to let attitude impact a work day -- it is human nature to have an off day also. It is not human nature to mislead an erstwhile investor seeking information, and that should be addressed up front and if not to the person, then to his supervisor/manager.

So, there is a course of action to take and make progress on -- you have embarked on that path, to engage the company with a complaint. Rather than merely addressing it to BR through a blind Integral email, you might also consider forward your concerns and complaints to IMG, Integral Technologies' PR connection. They, by rights, should be in a position to forward such feedback to the management directly--and if not, at the very least it should strike a chord of concern that you are reaching others outside their sphere of control to express your dissatisfaction with events and felt it necessary to involve others eyes and ears with your words.

Just thoughts -- once again, I meant to keep it short, but the ramble mode works best when I am tired, and it is well past my bedtime now...

Cheers and best,

PK sends...