EB - Readers Q&A: November 2006

Thursday, November 30, 2006

Reader Interaction - 25 Sep 2006




Missing the Milestones Covered – while focusing on the Day-to-Day Stock Price.




25 September 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Our stock is taking a beating. What are your thoughts?



-------------------



Hello EB Reader,

Well, I'll say what I believe--that this is a temporary matter, good only if you day traded (which I don't), but that is not what you are asking for or about -- so here is what I think...

This weekend, I forwarded a message to Integral's leadership through IR.

In short I detailed my thoughts on the cause/effect and a ready-made solution.

The extremely short version:

The “A” cause: the company's IR. They may not be able to disclose all that everyone desires, and it is human nature to give more than one should especially when interacting over the phone. This can lead some to walking away from the message of the day/month, etc. with false expectations or worse hearing something that was not said, or even implied.

The “B” cause: missed opportunities to get the right message to the investors or to explain the immediate and long reaching goals. In this I mean instances such as not highlighting the QuanStar conclusion or worse, not explaining to the shareholders that they brought the company to the boardrooms of a number of leader military industrial corps, an Integral walked away impressing them all -- or that this was not a break but the conclusion to this phase of their established business relationship, and that both companies are still friendly and if the need arises in the near or distant future QuanStar will readily make its services available to Integral to further both of their interests.

This could have been done for the confusing $1 licensing fees extracted from both Heatron and Jasper too -- a quick explanation to the smartness of this deal would have garnered the company investor buy-in to their long-range vision. Instead, they left people to wonder, and wonder--with the addition of negative prompting from some with an agenda out there on the some message boards. That, and the lack of visible forward progress and supporting words, may have helped in causing the effect of fear, and panic in those not yet able to see the true potential and encompassing capabilities surrounding the product IP, and this as an investment.

The solution I recommended was to better coordinate their messages to reach their target audience -- not in a press release, but better, by using their "mass email mailing list" to target, inform and include (or at least enlighten) shareholders in the company's decision making process. Treat their investors like the esteemed shareholders they are, and let them know that their investment and trust are appreciated, while at the same time, giving them just that bit more than which they would be able to read in a common press release.

The reality is, the fundamentals are the same as when we first corresponded. In fact, they are even better now that Jasper is publicly in the picture, and with their production capability, who knows, one day they might even be announced as the nation's first ElectriPlast material compounder. The supply-chain is coming into focus, and all pieces, with the exception of the additional patents, and following that, the announced clients, are in place. Both are very close.

Ok, maybe this was a bit longer than extremely short.

This is a temporary situation.

Answer me this: What has really changed between the company of now and the company of $3.75-$4.10?

More importantly, do you doubt we will see that range again -- or surpass it once either of the latter pieces of the above-mentioned picture comes into frame.

You asked my thoughts. If Bill Robinson gets word of my recommendations, he could see an immediate net effect -- that and more importantly, he will be on the path to rebuilding conviction and encouragement among the shareholders, with the end result of garnering inclusive buy-in on the vision, and winning the hearts and minds of investors, while speaking directly to the stakeholders who actually “get” just how disruptive this material could one-day become.

I should change my moniker to the Rambling-man cause I do have a hard time keeping a conversation short...

Cheers and best to you,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 16 Sep 2006




Is Jasper Rubber Buying Stock in Integral?




16 September 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Do you know if Jasper Rubber has purchased any ITKG stock thru any special offering? Somebody has given them financing. All indication is that they were close to being short on cash.

Have a great weekend. Love your latest Blog article. I look forward everyday when I check your Blog to see something new.

The big question is:

Are we having fun?! I say--Yes. Life is good when you have made $135,000 on paper with ITKG stock. And it's all resting in a 401K account.

Have a great weekend.



----------------------



EB Reader,

You ask a great question -- unfortunately all I have to go on are rumors, which do not amount to much. Suffice it to note that Integral is looking soon to place its stock on one of the major indexes in the near future. To do this, they will require a substantial amount of capitol on hand, and depending on the exchange (AMEX or NASDAQ), the stock to trade at a $3 to $5 range for a period of time.

According to a solid source rumor, the cash is in-place and ready for this next step. The company is more than likely waiting on that first major announcement to place it over the top and substantiate that trade target range.

So, in response, at least to part of your question, I would not worry about cash-flow issues. The arrangement between the companies will unfold, and your friends attending the shareholder get-together in Jasper might uncover more on that to substantiate the rumors already heard on this front.

Cheers and thanks for the good words -- my editor will be thrilled at the appreciation & acknowledgement of and for his most recent good works.

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 14 Sep 2006




Fearful Questions on Déjà Vu, all over again?




14 September 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

I have talked with four other ITKG investors. They are concerned that we are re-living the past when announcements were made with agreements but no revenue producing contracts coming to fruition. One of these individuals is a substantial investor who asked a question that is hard to answer. The question was this:

"In researching Press Releases in early 2000, ITKG came out with some pretty strong announcements that they had a couple of cell phone manufacturers in the initial phases of utilizing the "PlasTenna" product. What is to say that we are re-living the past with nothing substantial and more dilution on the way?"

I did not no how to respond. The question is: how much longer can I get these guys to hang on before dumping?

I am telling them to sit tight. I can only hope and pray that this announcement is the beginning of several more announcements coming within the next two weeks. Keep in mind, Bill Robinson (BR) and Tom Aisenbrey sat in front of 20 or so shareholders in Jasper Indiana commenting on 7 licenses before the end of the year. I have to believe that Bill is not that dumb to be making those types of comments without being pretty darn sure that something will happen.

It is so hard to try to get these guys to understand that the past is different from the present. I can only hope that I am leading them down the correct path.



-------------------



EB Reader,

I have an answer to that question, but it is late and I hope you do not mind if I take it on tomorrow so it will have a ring of sense to it.

In the meantime, realize this simple fact. With the manufacturer announced, this puts Integral on a totally new level than it has ever experienced in the past.

Answer this question: How close is the Jasper Rubber/Integral relationship? Once you do that, you will sense where my thoughts already reside. By the way, you are spot on, this is a different time--but that would mean that one would have to believe that a company is aware of its past and is willing to learn from that.

As for your friends or anyone else -- if anyone has a desire to sell, then you have to let them. It is their money, and at the end of the day, their responsibility as to how they trade their shares. I know it might sound heartless, and that we wish others could share in our good fortunes, but try as we might, we cannot enlighten everyone. Different people have varying thresholds of understanding. For some the act of investing is, simply put, divining reason and reality from the uncertain fear of the almost or unknown.

If these individuals you speak of sell at a profit, then be happy for them. You and I know that this has the potential of being larger, but for some, the stress of market risk is too much - let them go with their peace of mind intact. And trust in the fact, the company will not sink due to their absence. Once the first sale is made, and material validation is...well...verified, know that the shares sold due to personal uncertainty will be bought on the cheap by someone who "gets it." That's someone who actually understands what the capabilities and product market potential are at hand.

Cheers and best regards from the Heart of Bavaria,

PK sends...



------------------------



EB Reader,

Here is the historical skinny on the 2000 announcement, and the later announcement with MOT.

First -- Integral attempted a couple of different tact’s at getting into the market at little cost, and without going the route of buying into an expensive manufacturing element.

Initially, they tried mentoring under GE. They even hired one of GE's former top pitchmen, an individual named RAVI.

This relationship was cast asunder due to the back-deal work conducted by both GE and Ravi with Integral left almost unawares. BR caught onto the game and cut the relationship immediately, and fired Ravi to boot.

They then worked with DuPont -- a tragedy I had mentioned in the past.

Well, during this time frame, they were lead to believe the skies were the limit.

They have sided with the market giants, and with their clout supporting them, they were allowed to dream -- the PR's of the time reflected the optimism surrounding the moment. That and the fact that other companies Integral was introduced to, impressed by the association with GE, and later DuPont -- and more importantly by the solid supply-chain support these companies were able to guarantee -- these companies gave ear to what Integral had to say and upon seeing the material at work, became believers.

As you will note, and as I hinted in my email yesterday, the supply-chain is the ultimate key surrounding both the success of Integral, and their successful introduction to the marketplace.

No company will do business with another if assurances cannot be given on product or material availability.

Because Integral never owned a manufacturing plant, they could not offer that assurance -- which is why they attempted to mentor under, work along side of, and finally license rights to larger companies who literally control markets, or manufactures.

This is where the difference rests. Integral has found what they consider a TRUSTED AGENT in JARCO. Now Integral can share the unique characteristics of ElectriPlast with a trusted outside source, which will have a shared investment in Integrals interests and material needs & requirements.

Second, they tried dealing directly with companies. This gave them freedom to allow the company to contact and negotiate deals directly with a recommended manufacture that had access to the secrets behind ElectriPlast IP materials. This is where the deal with MOT began and died.

Simply put, BR dealt with one MOT management team who presided over the failed Sat Phone (Iridium) venture. Hundreds upon hundreds of millions were lost outright on that prospect, and the loss nearly broke MOT. There was also the case that Integral had yet to find a manufacture that it felt comfortable in sharing its IP secrets to -- but that is a later matter to consider. Suffice it for now to know that MOT was one of Integral's first-steps to engage larger companies directly. With each in the end, the supply-chain guarantee ended up limiting the marketing ability, and curtailed the promises of material delivery required before a contract could be signed...

But, let’s go back to the MOT saga. A new, more conservative management took over on the MOT board. Unfortunately, Integral's contact, and former work-through Program Manager left with the earlier board. Integral Letter of Intent to conduct business was passed on to the new strategic Sponsors within the MOT organization, and left to wilt and die. Integral still engages with MOT, but not at the level they once did. Whether they are still test bedding the ElectriPlast material is unknown--at least to me--at this time.

That's it for the history and on why the times now are so drastically different.

Now BR can make promises. Now, with the power and resources of a manufacturer/compounder behind him, he can tell company x, y, or z just how much raw material he can arrange for them to get, and when.

Before, he could not...

PS -- would you mind if I use portions of this and the earlier email in an upcoming Blog submission? The words offered might be helpful to other shareholders echoing similar sentiments...

Please let me know.

Cheers and best regards from the Heart of Bavaria,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 12 Sep 2006




Addressing Questions on Patents Part II...




12 September 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Thank you again for your detailed and well thought out answers. I knew the 150 million shares were probably both a defensive matter as well as currency to buy something important (manufacturer possibly).

I am a little confused about what you said about a take-over company buying each individual Patent. I have not read any of the various Patent applications. I had assumed that the Patents are registered in the name of the company. These Patents are ITKG's IP and the basis of the company and it's business/value. Like QCOM or RMBS. When you buy this company you are buying the 100+ Patents, is this not correct? I will do a patent search as soon as I send this because I am now very interested in your above comments.

You may of course use any question I pose. We're all hopefully seeking truth and knowledge.

I appreciate your time and intellect.

Best Regards to you in Deutschland,



---------------------



EB Reader -- sorry to confuse -- that was assumption on my part working hard. I thought that you had already read into the patents.

The patents are registered to Integral Technologies, but the inventions are all based upon Tom Aisenbrey's research and knowledge, and drafted/submitted under his and Integral's name.

That said, yes, a company seeking to gobble up a little company like Integral would find that the patents, though registered via Integral, have a codicil which notes Tom's role in their development, and shared ownership.

This would be the company's leverage in keeping an outsider from merely buying out the shares in the company to own the IP derived from the patents. Tom & Integral, would hold out for payment on almost each of the almost 100 plus near-term (within the next year or two) patents in the works now, and up to a total of almost 300 future patents--a goal referenced in past interviews on the subject.

All I was trying to note in my meanderings was that the company has built a solid foundation on the off chance that a hostile takeover could ever occur. And with the discussion of having a trusted-agent manufacturer on the team, depending on the arrangement agreed upon; along with the true potential of the ElectriPlast material and its IP value to the marketplace -- well, suffice it to note, Integral's management will have not only controlling power over their product, but will be able to fulfill any and all commercial orders without pause.

Both actions will serve to accelerate the company’s growth in the market, and with more associated product on the streets and in consumer's hands. Such a move would offer ready recognition for the ElectriPlast branding label, and the materials overall capability.

In short - I see it as a good thing if, if this trusted-agent manufacturer relationship becomes as tight as my initial murmurings and thoughts wish for them to be.

The reality, and the rest of the story will come with time, but my wishes would fall in line with whatever military associations that were developed through QuanStar (such businesses would require a solid manufactured material supply-chain before committing contracted negotiations--at least that is my opinion of how that world would work).

Once again, time will well. In the meantime, we can research the speculated opinions, and push the possibilities just that much further.

Cheers and best regards from the Heart of Bavaria,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 11 Sep 2006




Addressing Questions on Patents Part I...




11 September 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


Thanks PK.

(Blogger’s Note: This is a response to an earlier email containing information wherein one of the three parties interacting chose not to have their words shared beyond those addressed.)

Your friend sounds very excited about the IP and it's possibilities.

May I ask you this; Does having a manufacturer mean (which is what I had thought they were going to be doing), someone to make the batches of the proprietary beads, (which are then sent to the 3rd party manufacturer/molder to make the finished product), or does it mean they need to have a factory with molding and tooling equipment and a processing/packaging line??

So, let's hope that some great products from some great companies will be in the works soon.

I appreciate you keeping me informed.

Best Regards from L.A.



---------------------



EB Reader -- all good questions...

Once again -- before I share my thoughts, would you mind if I share this email with others? I believe that the questions you asked touches the heart of issues that are of interest and have implications well beyond this brief interaction. Please let me know...

The primary importance of having a manufacture is trust, and maybe more beyond that. Whoever produces Integral's proprietary material will have access to the secrets that make ElectriPlast what it is... The same secrets that DuPont tried, but failed to reproduce on their own.

Beyond trust is the ability to dictate your company's needs beyond that of the manufacturer--who could be doing similar work for a whole host of similar niche companies.

What you will uncover in the weeks to come, starting with the link below is that Integral has finally found such a company, and they do have a level of trust and understanding that will, by far, surpass work in their--and as shareholders--our favor. In other words, you might find that Integral may end up either buying into this yet-to-be-named-manufacture, or they may be bought out by this same entity. No matter how it fleshes out, we will end up on the top because--and this is the kicker and the most significant key to the position we find ourselves in--it's all because of the 150 million in shares added onto the stock back in April/May of this year.

http://electriplast.blogspot.com/2006/09/electriplast-mysterious-manufacturing.html

How does that 150 million add to the mix?

Consider this, to buy out Integral, a company like GE or DuPont will have to pay large--well into the tens of billions--and far more after the word of the take-over emerges to purchase the shares necessary. Add to that, buying out the company will not be enough, they will also have to purchase each and every patent developed--more 10's to 100's of millions of dollars each.

In my opinion -- The company never meant to use the 150 million that was added to the company's balance for selling to shareholders, but rather its use was meant for protection from any kind of aggressive stock take-over. Whoever tried an unfriendly takeover would hurt from the effort, and might make their own company vulnerable to similar actions.

I know, well beyond the premise of your question -- I just wanted you to realize, the manufacturing question went well beyond the making of pellets, or molding material. The company Integral gets involved with will be able to do both most assuredly. Instead, the question goes to the heart of just how successful Integral intends to be with their ElectriPlast material. So successful that then possibly negotiate a merger with a plastics manufacturer -- one who sees such potential in ElectriPlast that it casts aside that host of other niche customers to dedicate all its efforts and attention to the security of IP issues and the ultimately further ElectriPlast's span of control into an unwitting market...

Think along those lines, and I believe you will begin to see the vast, vast potentials associated to this IP and the shares you currently hold.

Now that I have said my piece -- If you read the Blog, you might realize that both GE and DuPont at one time had a relationship with Integral -- can you begin to imagine how that favored line applies now...

Cheers and best regards from the Heart of Bavaria,

PK sends...



Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Reader Interaction - 6 Sept 2006




Request for Information...




6 September 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Just a hunch from myself, an individual shareholder..........

First, forget Motorola and forget Nokia.

I'm sure that you are aware that one of the tech industry buzzing is that Apple has been developing a cell phone/ipod that might be ready to ship around the 2nd quarter 2007. Wouldn't it be both a coup for ITKG and a unique forward move for Apple if they introduced their first cell phone (which you know will have to be both spectacularly innovative, ground-breaking, earth shattering, and beautifully designed) with the new Plas Tenna. The first cell phone without an antenna (and with waaaay better reception) would be such an Apple thing to do.

My gut is telling me that ITKG is involved. I could of course be totally wrong, I am a dreamer, but if this were to indeed be a reality, can you imagine what a lightening bolt from heaven this would be for us shareholders. The entire world, from the millions of ipod kids, to the life long Mac junkies, to wall street analysts, to silicon valley techies, to Madison avenue. The entire world will be watching when Steve Jobs rolls out this phone in about 6 months. If this phone is as beautiful and spectacular as I know it will be, then this iphone will be the *must have* for millions of ipod kids around the world and (here's the dream part again) if ITKG is indeed involved then the people in Bellingham will be issuing future licenses as fast as Beetles records were selling in 1964. This Iphone could be another pop culture phenomenon.

You have a great site PK and I appreciate everything you do in relation to ITKG.

Thanks for reading/listening,



------------------



Hi there EB Reader --

Now that is truly thinking outside of the box. . .

Actually, I heard a similar story from a friend not too long ago. The truth is, Integral's ElectriPlast/Plastenna is a good fit in a number of areas:

From WiFi/WiMAX PDA's with Bluetooth and GPS capabilities (for an example, see ACER N35); to, as you note, the next generation of Apple's IPODs...and the list can go on.

If you do not mind, I'd like to pass your email on to a friend. As I noted earlier, the association--or one very similar--had already been made. I have been looking into the Military connections that QuanStar brought to the table over the past year, and the possibilities are staggering. The commercial side is just as empowering, and all it would take is one well-known association to make this speculative venture into a NASDAQ player.

As an aside -- keep your ear to the ground for word regarding a future manufacturing connection. If the few rumors I've run across are true, then once that becomes a reality, the providing of IP material to the various test-bedding producers in question--to include the Apple's of the world...well, let's just say that the more control Integral has over its ElectriPlast material, the more it's shareholders will benefit just through association alone.

Cheers and best from the heart of Bavaria,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 31 Aug 2006




Request for Information...




31 August 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Can you send or direct me to a copy of the full report about ITKG? Thanks.



------------------



Hi there EB Reader,

I don't work for Integral Technologies, and have no reports other than those requested over time -- during my forays at due diligence.

The best recommendation I could offer would be to direct you to the Integral Technologies Investor Relations and request an Investors package.

Phone: 888-666-8833
Fax: 360-752-1983
Email: itkgbb@itkg.net

Address

Integral Technologies, Inc.
805 West Orchard Drive
Suite 7
Bellingham WA 98225

Investor Relations

888.666.8833
604.685.9933

Cheers and best to you.

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 23-25 Aug 2006




Driving the Stock Price on Promises...



23-25 August 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

I was wondering why the company seems to have a good solid three year track record of stating quite convincingly that there is something just about to happen. Yet here the story goes again, we're just minutes away from inking a deal with and actual product, and the stock is taking off, again. Again.

What's to say this is the real time?

I was also wondering what's going on. The stock is taking off, but will it soon fall back again?

When will more patents be approved and will a deal ever be approved?

Internet searches provide very few clues as to what's going on.

What is driving this stock up?

Promises?



-------------------------



Actually, those great questions.

In response, I would say that the Patents are the key factor in this event over all else.

In prior years, the company acknowledged openly that they were in a development phase. Development means just that, testing & validating -- and not just the product, but the markets they had intentions to exploit.

While it is true, this could have taken off years earlier, one thing had always held that momentum back -- the lack of Patents . Actually that is not quite correct, and I'll amend myself now to note that history and lessons learned along the path also contributed.

As I noted in previous Blogs and in commentaries to those who emailed, Integral had a legal tussle over their initial WiFi/Bluetooth market venture years back -- their micro-antennas, reputed to be some of the best on the market.

A legal attempt at blackmail by IAS Communications, a one-time partner to Integral Technologies curbed ITKG's initial attempt to go to market, just as the wireless niche market was starving for their promised contribution. By the time Integral won the lawsuit, the market had saturated with a number of other competitive antenna products.

During that lawsuit, Integral's Tom Aisenbrey invented the ElectriPlast material, calling it Plastenna--because that was their primary focus at the time. Over time, they uncovered a myriad of other potentials to this material and began developing them.

But that is another story. Going back to the main point -- after the development process began, the company leadership thought to further their efforts by mentoring under GE. This brief marriage did not work out, and lead to a relationship with DuPont. DuPont, after realizing the potential and value of ElectriPlast, acted inappropriately with their NDA (non disclosure agreement) access.

With that, Integral pushed in earnest the ongoing process of exploring and garnering patents for each discovered process that ElectriPlast excelled at. It was a blessing in disguise in that both the management and the inventor were forced to look beyond the box and discover multiple potentials beyond the antenna aspect.

It was then that the company announced that it was becoming a Plastics' company.

Since then they have worked, in conjunction with PG&E, those patent concerns and are literally ready to go forward both on the civilian side of the market, and through QuanStar, the military side.

What is to say that it is real this time -- I got no answer for you because that would be leading!

Understand that this is still a penny stock – risks, losses and potential benefits & windfall profits all added into the mix.

If you invested here, and have a sense as to the potential, then you are aware of the heights to which this company and its promising IP could reach.

If not, then I would recommend cashing out and watching from the sidelines -- but stand back.

Whether you choose to believe it or not, this is a forward progressing story, and it will continue with or without you being present...

PS -- What is driving this stock up is the same thing that put it on your radar. There is a good story with great potentials and possibilities associated. If it sounds plausible, and people are willing to believe then they will invest.

If it sounds plausible, and people can sense the reality behind the story, then they will invest.

If it sounds plausible, and people can see the product in action and sense the reality presented by their eyes, then they will invest.

While it is true, a number of companies have testbedded the product for their own use, they are not the only entities in creation holding an NDA with Integral -- nor are they the only ones who have seen for themselves the reality behind the IP or this investment.

There is a large amount of money being traded on this company, I find it hard to believe that the story is so widely spread that so many hundreds of thousands of people who are weekly--in the blind--forking down three bucks and change just to see their investment go through on the stock ticker. In other words, I would assume that one entity, or another has seen the product for themselves and as a result decided to invest a chunk of their own change based on their observations.

I would assume that with the more companies out there testbedding the ElectriPlast product, that more than one entity is out there investing as a result...

But that is merely an assumption on my part -- otherwise, I have not heard any official promises, nor would I expect to.

This is the stock market -- and like in real-life, "Risk is a Factor, not a Promise, or an Assurance".

PK sends...



Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Reader Interaction - 30 July 2006




Addressing a Pundit Commentary from the iHub Board--a Tired Trend Continues...



30 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

As Sputnik rants and raves on IHUB, I now have him on ignore.

Do you have any estimate of when ITKG will show signs of reporting revenues?

The patents are good news, and they are very significant, but after so much time we need to see signs that others are grasping and accepting the technology. We need to see market acceptance and some testimonials from happy users.

When will this begin?

Many thanks, cheers.



--------------------



EB Reader,

Testimonials -- you'll see that as product comes to market, not before...


The public word from the company is that this year, 2006, is the go-to-market year. Next year, 2007, will see ample evidence of that happening. The rest-of-the-story centers on finalizing a number of criteria that past lessons had taught the company to take care of before going to market.

1st -- resolve all pending legal actions -- step up to the plate with a clean slate. (if you review the news from the past two years, that is what was occurring. Whether there was a possibility that someone could lay legal claims against, or there were true facts to support past claims, patents, in-house issues (anything that could kai-bosh a potential market run) these were addressed and resolved.)

2nd -- resolve the supply-chain issues -- if you review press releases and commentary from the boards or where every you choose to look, you will sense that the company principles have been traveling. Not hawking their wares (not wholly). More, they have been making inroads on the supply chain issues: manufacturing, legal, patents, marketing, networking-in-general. Quanstar and a number of other agreements support that game plan.

3rd -- resolve the money issues -- the proxy vote centers as the most recent initiative on that front. Then there are the noted plans to move beyond the OTCBB to a more stable, orderly market--one where the market makers agenda does not curry so vast an influence over the daily pps movement.

4th -- closing some of the long established licensing agreements. Some companies have been testbedding ElectriPlast materials for something like 4 years now. (I know, if they have had the material for so long, why is there not a product on the streets.) For the same reason that NASA doesn't launch prototype rockets. Rumor has it that some of these companies are well known Fortune 100/500 entities. Once the name is associated to the ElectriPlast product -- well, that will satisfy your comment below. Even still, no one can truly predict the market, or the times surrounding the emergence of a new product. It's like predicting that the "Pet Rock" would take off as it did. No one in their right mind at the time would have guessed.

All I can say to the prospect of wanting something to happen is sit back and enjoy the ride. Either you have a sense that this is a real thing, or you don't.

The ElectriPlast Blog is presented in a fashion to give you a peek at what is possible, but this is an investment fraught with pitfalls and controversy. Let's call it what it really is, it's a OTCBB Penny Stock. Speculative as HELL, and just as potentially rewarding.

What is going to happen will happen, whether you want it to occur faster, or in a different sequence. The four items I listed above scratch at the surface of the things that have taken place behind the scenes and bought us to this point here-and-now. Because I realize the history associated, I can afford to take a longer view. The best advice I can offer after that is to let you in on the real secret.

"You have to have a vision as to what is possible when it comes to conductive plastics." If you have read my blog, then you have a clue, but the following video link--also in the blog--should help to calm your passions for instant success.

http://www.utexas.edu/inside_ut/take5/loo/

Cheers and best,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 26-27 July 2006




Addressing a Pundit Commentary from the iHub Board--a Tired Trend Emerging...



26-27 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Are you familiar with Swartz and/or Wellington as Sputnik refers to?

Posted by: Sputnik

Good luck to you. I have followed this stock for several years. History has documented that when the Post Am is filed the selling security holders sell, not hold, especially Swartz. Considering that quite a bit is in the "Wellington" group of retirement funds a 100%+ return in two years leads me to believe that they will take the money and run. I know that quite a few don't want the past to be discussed here, but facts are facts.




---------------------



EB Reader,

Yes -- both...

Just as they (Integral's management team) were about to move forward in the marketplace with their line of Micro-Antenna products which were poised to address the newfound needs of an emerging wireless world; just after they borrowed a lump sum of capital from Swartz, a malicious lawsuit occurred. I mention aspects of that event within the Blog.

Needless to say, the impact was immediate, potential contracts were lost, and manufacturing agreements were stalled. Integral was reeling from the implications of the lawsuit, and more from the time it took to conclude.

The longer the delay, the more companies --other than Integral-- could capitalize on what at one time looked like "their" niche WiFi/Bluetooth/3G wireless market.

The suit lasted a year and a number of weeks. Integral Technologies as a company was almost bankrupt (but far from that point due to a new IP discovery), and they had a product which was no longer novel, or unique to the tech markets.

During this lawsuit, Tom Aisenbury discovered ElectriPlast (then called Plastenna).

Because of the lawsuit, they kept this discovery hush-hush for fear of the opposition possibly dragging that into court and laying claim to its creation. ((you might now begin to sense where they get their tight-lipped attitude toward the outside world)).

While all this was going on, the company still had a loan with Swartz to deal with.

Luckily, Bill Robinson (BR) took a frugal approach to the contract, and used all angles to both pay off the loan in quick order, and do so in cash--from product sales--whenever possible.

In short, he did not do like some tech companies of the time did, prostitute themselves into hock to loan companies by using company stocks...

This was how they became free and clear of Swartz and cut their ties completely. Hence, when I note that I am comfortable with the company's fiscal policies, I have a history to draw from.

What you might hear from this Sputnik may be different. If so, I won't express what I think of him or his observed tactics ~~ but I would encourage you to seek out the truth for yourself...

As for Wellington -- they are still involved with ITKG, and have reaped great rewards from their initial buy in price as a result of their focusing in Integral's direction. I would expect that bond to continue.

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 26 July 2006




Addressing a Pundit Commentary from the iHub Board...




26 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Are you aware of this seen on the iHub recently:

Posted by: Sputnik

It appears that the latest group of ITKG financiers is getting ready to sell there shares. The company just recently filed a post effective amendment with the SEC to announce the reselling (no compensation to the company) of some 11,000,000 shares. Why would they do that?




----------------------



Not of the post; but of the action (or rather intention of this action) yes.

I mentioned this to you in the past* as a matter of fact, my last post on the Blog was centered on this premise...

All companies have the ability to sell shares at one set price in order to raise capital for an event, operation, or objective. They sell these shares to an entity and that entity purchases them at a set price (sometimes at, or below market value). If below market value, then they have full rights to these shares, but cannot sell them for a set period of time (2 to 4 years) depending on the agreement behind the sale / purchase.

In this specific case -- rather than to feed into that specific posters pointed agenda to raise an alarm and cause panic -- think for a moment and imagine:

Why the company would want to raise capital at this specific time* (a time when they are focused on selling a product, and fine-tuning aspects surrounding their supply-chain) ??

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 25 July 2006




Questioning the Proxy Vote, Continued...




25 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

I received this today and responded accordingly. If the shares are being held as Treasury stock-there is no problem. After all, that's all I was asking to begin with.

Transparancy is critical.

I still have not received confirmation from the company. You may contact XXXXXXX to review my reply-which included a research report from LUX RESEARCH that I forwarded.

This matter should have been made clear by the company on May 10th when the OS was bumped from 50mil to 150mil to avoid any confusion.

I've informed a lot of my followers that all seems ok and I think that accounted for the jump in todays price.

I continue to value your insights-and I have many of my own to pass onto you as well.

Cheers



-------------------------



"Mr. XXXXXXX,

Hello! Sorry to be so slow with a response, but I only check this account a couple of times a week.

I'll answer your question as best I can and attempt to answer any that may still remain.

Integral's Authorized Shares (AS) was increased from 50mm to 150mm on May 10, 2006 via a vote of Shareholders. This was the first increase in the AS since the Company's inception a little over 10 years ago. Obviously, all of the additional AS have not been Issued -- indeed, if any of them have, it has not yet been made public.

I believe the current number of Outstanding Shares still stands at less than 50mm. That includes what's in the float, those that are restricted, as well as their warrants. It's clear that a small number of the AS (the numbers I have heard is 3-5mm) will be issued at some point in the future to raise additional funding.

You may want to place a call to Investor Relations if you're so inclined. They should be able to give you the exact breakdown of what's in the flaot, how many are restricted, and the number of warrants yet to be exercised. But as I mentioned, I believe that total number to be less than 50 million.

I hope this helps. It was nice hearing from you.

XXXXXXX"




Reader Interaction - 24-25 July 2006




Questioning the Proxy Vote, Continued...




24-25 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Just letting you know that I received no reply from the company upon my sending an email requesting the status of the true float. I smell a big fat rat here; and I encourage you to look deeper into this matter as I have. Someone holds a lot of stock to sell at anytime.

Look at the recent drop for confirmation-lots of innocent people get badly hurt from stocks like this.

No one ever asked the real tough questions as I have-and look at the decline!


-------------------------


EB Reader,

In the past, questions have been asked, and answers were given--that process continues as this company changes. You are not the first to create that wheel.

I am not a financial analyst, or accountant, but I have great trust in those who have worked at that as a career. Those who have been at that task for the past 20 years and have the experience to share. One of these individuals of trust is a friend, and he is working to sum up an answer to your query on my behalf.

FYI--the individual I am referring to, until recently, knows this company's principles. He not only researched the company thoroughly, but he invested, and remains invested there also.

Until he relays his summary, rather than getting twisted over this issue, I might recommend you lighten your investment load for the time being. Or, if you truly feel you smell the "rat" then maybe you should simply throw a pass at the whole investment option.

The company will continue down its path, and the reality is, if you are as suspicious as your note indicates, that latter option might offer a certain peace of mind.

Over the past number of years, I have talked to a number of people on this very issue, and for the most part I am aware of the broad-stroke answers.

As I noted, questions have been asked, and while you are right, the company will do little more than point you toward SEC reports submitted, there are those available who can read into the numbers and give you the honest answers to those "hard" questions. Once again, I am far from an accountant--there are basic fundamentals that you must learn when it comes to stocks if you wish to truly track/trend that aspect. I am aware, but have never learned the fundamentals--that is not my focus, and I won't pretend to be the expert there, but I will offer assistance when possible, and have. I referred your question to one I trust.

At this point, that is the sincere best I can do in offering a valid assist.

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 22 July 2006




Questioning the Proxy Vote, Continued...



22 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

I've reviewed past articles and unfortunately could not find the current stock distribution.

We all know the number of authorized shares increased from 50 to 150 million. What I cannot find is where those shares are.

That difference is important since it provides us with the potential overhang of shares that could be sold anytime.

If we have rule-144 stock involved, then that's great since it restricts sellers.

All the company filings show is that 15 million shares are held by warrant conversions and can be sold at any time by the shareholders. But what about the other 85 million shares?

Where did they go?


--------------------------



EB Reader

Here's the deal in regards to the authorized increase of share. The distribution is public knowledge and reported via SEC reporting criteria, but is buried (kept vague) because it allows for flexibility on the off chance that and outside entity attempts to buy out the company to suite their own agenda--through the purchase of the company's stock. It affords the management, and at the end of the day, the shareholders, protection from such an event.

In short, there is no leading intention to touch those shares in an effort to make a quick buck. That would have happened long ago, when they first increased to 50 million share--and then there were financial considerations which could have tempted them management to look hard at going that direction.

At this time, the financial consideration are low--extremely low. Not that they are a money generating entity as yet, but they are not begging for their next meal either. The company is solvent to the extent that they can afford to wait 1 or 2 years without outside support, and still move their product to market as the game plan dictates.

I know that you want more, and there is no sense in throwing the olive branch of trust at these people, you don't know them personally and their history means less due to the fact that it is merely a host of facts presented online or offered by me--and who knows what kind of agenda I have while running a website featuring of all things a little known stock company which has recently garnered a small bit of fame and recognition.

I understand your wary hesitation and interest, and do not argue against it--as a matter of fact, I tend to appreciate such thoughts because they keep me from becoming lazy, sitting upon my personal giant, watching as the scenes unfold.

There is no complaint and I encourage you to develop that line of due diligence further. I will offer my view where needed or asked--but at this point, I can offer that I have touched this matter a number of times both in the recent and distant past. I have covered the loan from Schwartz. In all instances--I saw no deception against the shareholders, though I must be honest and note that I saw no eager rush for full disclosure. This is information their legal advisors have offer advice on, and the managers at Integral are following those recommendations. That said, I do have history to base my assessments upon also, and have used that to form my filter when judging the managements next step agenda/strategy considerations.

Long email, I know, but I wanted you to understand where I am coming from also.

If you wish to develop that Due Diligence, please do. I have touched this matter a number of times in the past. I am comfortable with this outcome and sense no tricks in the works.

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 22 July 2006




Questioning the Proxy Vote...




22 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

On 10 May 2006, the company issued a news wire re: increasing the number of shares from 50 to 150 million.

Do you know if any of those shares are restricted?

If not there are at least 11 million shares added to the float from the conversion of warrants from private placement deals.

Yahoo shows the float at 40 million.

We need to focus on the correct current capital structure of this company. Any facts you could provide will be very much appreciated.

Cheers


----------------


EB Reader,

The stock increase and proxy vote were covered in past Blog articles.

Yahoo does not focus only on Integral Technologies, nor are they accountable to keep all of their links up-to-date.

If you uncover anything other than that featured within the articles detailed on the blog, please let me know and I will post accordingly. To date, the company has disclosed what they have and could.

The motivations surrounding the proxy vote--to my sense--are transparent, and are in preparation to firming the foundation of/for future events (the expected market breakout, and mass stock movement of ElectriPlast).

Once again, if you believe my view, or the views posted on the EB are incorrect, then I am open to learning, and correcting my worldview. More importantly, I am open to sharing that corrected view with those using the ElectriPlast Blog as a knowledge resource.

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 19-22 July 2006




Do You Really Believe?




19-22 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Hi there.

I feel rather odd sending you an e-mail but I came across your Blog a few weeks ago and was curious to know how you found your way to ITKG. I actually bought it back in 2001 and have spent the last several years wondering why. I rode it up to 1.98, all the way back to .27 and now to new un-chartered territory. A couple of friends who bought in last year sold at 3 but I have held on (probably too long) to see where this might go.

While the "story" of ITKG sounds good many tech companies do. Do you really believe that:

(a) ITKG has stumbled onto valuable intellectual property that can have mass appeal?

(b) And, that their 5 man company w/ very little financial backing actually has the ability to capitalize on it?

This is not exactly the kind of company, especially trading OTC, that one can really analyze to make a rational decision to either invest in or to remain invested in.

Since you have clearly spent some time creating your Blog I thought you might have a different perspective.


--------------------


Hello EB Reader,

Don't feel odd at all about asking a question--and I won't tell you any outrageous lies about this company, or it's potential.

The reality is this is a highly charged, and even more highly speculative stock venture. The reality also is, if the story has the chance of being true, your investment will be akin to that of being one of the first to invest into Wal-Mart, Microsoft, eBay or Starbucks. It is that risky, that dangerous, but also that potentially explosive.

The reason I am bothered to work a Blog on this "as you call it" story is simple.

There are a number of dis-separate reports highlighting the potentials associated, but no resource--to include the Integral website--which brings it all together. But more importantly, I do this because the timing behind the prospective roll-out of this company's product is right, right now.

There are a number of issues which makes me believe that this unseen, untouched material is real. Singularly key are the approved patents. There is also the money that some well known Institutionals have committed to this venture--in addition to the tests conducted thus far--though not open to public review. All of these issues add flavor to that 'story'.

Suffice it to say, there is supporting evidence to the realness associated. But I can understand your unease with the market, the product, and the eventual--at the end of the day--deal ever coming through.

There are many things that can go wrong, but I will be honest with you. Until we even get near that point, the stock's price per share will grow by leaps and bounds beforehand--and by that time whatever problems that emerge then, will have the solutions available to resolve them.

It is not like there is no tangible product or smoke and mirrors are involved. Within the next year, ElectriPlast products will be on the streets--in products produced by highly regarded, well known corporate names and manufactures. The patents note the potential. If half of what's reported in these write-ups is valid, then mass markets may well become impacted. My Blog is present and merely scratches at the surface of the potentials gleaned from those approved patents.

Those not yet approved (provisional patents) talk to the prospect of plastic based conductive wire, able to pass more voltage at lesser cost from point-to-point. They talk to the prospect of making molded circuit boards, with all components made from varying measures of the same material---all ElectriPlast based. And those are just a few examples. There are over 100 provisional patents--with more being worked--in the wings waiting for approval.

So there you have it. The stock will rise and fall, but it is in an upward progression at this time, and in my opinion, it will continue down this path until specific licensing agreements are penned, and the names of those companies associated with ElectriPlast become known.

Those are the underlying factors which will continue to support the growth of the stock and its price. Once these issues are known, the price per share will either explode dramatically, or falter. We are not there as yet--so when I note that this is the "rightness" in terms of timing and investment, I use this as the basis for my reasoning, and from that perspective, have no fear over a daily rise or drop in stock price--it is all relative until the above underlying factors become realized.

I hope that helped somewhat...

Cheers and best regards from Bavaria,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 21 July 2006




Appreciating Positive Stock Days...




21 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Has anyone emailed you to explain the huge drop in price? People are losing their shirts now.


---------------------


EB Reader,

No explanation--to be honest, I looked more at why the stock price per share (pps) increased as it did...

At first, I thought that word had migrated that news on a deal of some sort was leaked. After looking further, I realized that the initial spike was the result of a massive institutional purchase--everything that generated afterwards was the result of speculative investors playing at day-trades.

I mentioned to you in the past that the foundation is at this time rests $2.75-$3.00. From what I can see, that still stands for the moment -- that is until news from Bellingham alters that math...

My sense is, the chances of a rebound are strong. Moreover, those who sold and lost their shirts never quite got idea surrounding the potential impact ElectriPlast would have on the market once associated products began hitting the streets, and licensing/contract agreements become realized.

The stated goal of Bill Robinson is to move the stock from the OTCBB to the AMEX or NASDAQ in the very near future.

Depending on the news and breakthroughs that occurs in Bellingham, the when on that question mark will be satisfied.

The reality is, the company is--short of squaring out the supply chain issues--almost there at this point and needs a major licensing deal to make it happen.

Once Integral moves from the OTCBB to a more stable playing field as the AMEX or NASD, then the stock manipulation by the market makers will have a far less impact on the day to day, and the drastic swings we see now will fade due to the scrutiny of ever-present regulators watching the market makers and detailing the ebb and flow of their actions...

Not to be blasé about the price per share on any given day--a draw back is not always a bad thing... But I, like you, appreciate the positive days far more than not.

PK sends...



Monday, November 20, 2006

Reader Interaction - 18-19 July 2006




Readers' Initial Conception of this Q&A Blog...



18-19 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

What market cap should this stock have? How high will it go?

Just invite people to communicate with you via email. Then post the results. They can also join the IHUB bulletin board which is already in place. Let me know what you decide to do.


-----------------


EB Reader,

The Investor Hub option sounds like a viable option--and in checking it out, I see that it already has a moderator. I will email him to see if he is up for such collaboration.

In regards to the Market Cap associated to this company's stock -- I have heard, via email from other Blog readers who shared some of Mr. Tobin Smith's comments, that he sees vast potential, and I believe he keeps referring to it as a 10-bagger.

Personally, I do not know for certain. The market for the IP in question is unexplored (or rather, limited forays have been made, but none successful due to the poor quality material used at the time).

The company has three things going for it at this point.

Interest -- the prospects of ElectriPlast has the potential of touching every manufacturing product, and to that extent, the capabilities are limitless. Once the first sale is made, and the product hits the streets, its viability and value will be proven. From that point on, we are dealing with a real, touchable, working, material--and that could catapult the market value considerably. Think on it this way. People invested here are like venture capitalists. Granted it is not the exact same, but this is a penny stock, and these shareholders are investing now into a dream, sight unseen--which if it works, has the potential of multiplying their fortunes dramatically...

Patents -- the company has learned from its past mistakes, and now trusts in garnering the required patents before moving their product beyond the realm of their control. This is one prime reason behind the slow development and marketing of this ElectriPlast material. The short of it is they were not well protected. Within the next year, approximately 90 patents will become approved, with more being applied for to supplement the growing number of prospective uses of the material. One story, not well known, deals with a time, maybe 3 or 4 years ago, when DuPont had taken Integral under its wing, with promises to bankroll further development of their IP material. Tom Aisenbrey, smartly, did not share the secrets behind the creation of the ElectriPlast material--even though DuPont offered space in their labs for him to continue his work. It was discovered (rumor has it, by some patent researching Integral shareholders) that DuPont was quietly submitting patent applications for materials with similar properties/abilities to that of Integral's ElectriPlast. Rumor once again has it that Ellis, Preston & Gates stepped in and confronted DuPont. Their working relationship was severed, though you cannot walk totally away from a market leader. Still Integral left with their IP intact. Now, DuPont, realizing the missed opportunity--and moreover possibly the future potential involved, is attempting to play nice. At least that is how I read the situation. Suffice it to note, patents are the key to this company's fortunes, and future success.

Finally, the Need -- On the Blog, we have discussed the need of such a diverse material. As a matter of fact, almost 80% of the Blog's features detail issues of present or future need, and the technology enhancements associated. This is not a limited wonder like fiber-optics. ElectriPlast, in all its incarnations, has the potential of changing technology as we understand and view it today. A number of companies realize this and have been quietly working with/test-bedding samples of ElectriPlast materials. My sense, its integration into our society will be something like that of the cell phone. Once they were the exception, now they are the rule. Try to find a payphone these days, you will catch my meaning.

Mr. Tobin Smith referred this to a 10 bagger. In an effort to not hype the potential or the validity of his assessment, I have a sense that once it hits the streets and becomes a tangible issue, it could become like a Starbucks, Microsoft or the like. Only then will the potential become truly realized. For now, take the 10 bagger statement for what it is worth.

That almost sounded like a possible Blog entry -- would you mind if I considered using it and your question? Let me know. . .

Cheers and best regards once again, from the heart of Bavaria,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 18 July 2006




In Search Of other ITKG Discussion Boards...



18 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Is there a daily discussion board re: ITKG


----------------------


Hello EB Reader,

There are a few. One being on the RagingBull.com, but this site would not be a first, or even a last recommendation I would consider offering. It mostly consists of misinformation and harsh attacks. Visit and after a few moments you will see what I mean.

I have also had some email from Blog readers who noted they found reference to the Blog through visiting http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=926. And one individual noted that he uncovered a reference while at Motley Fool's message board -- sorry, I do not have a reference to that one.

I hope this helps, and that you find what you are looking for.

Cheers and best regards from the Bavaria,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 17 July 2006




Ancient History -- Revisited...




17 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Yes - Tobin Smith has to drop hints so you sign up for a subscription to see which hot stock he is hyping. He is also on the panel of a Saturday stock roundtable show that airs on Fox News.


How have you become familiar with this stock?

Cheers,


-----------------


EB Reader,

You might remember the origin of WiFi / Bluetooth and 3G/4G technologies.

Before most history was written on this company, they once were in partnership with a company called IAS communications. They both had jointly worked on antenna products, but IAS took the lead scientist who had just (at that time) built something called the CTHA antenna. CTHA was a novel new antenna technology which was reputed to turn future antenna technologies on its head, changing the world and burying the competition.

After this act, the companies--now wary of the others motivations--decided to split and go their separate ways.

The companies signed an agreement wherein: IASCA was given the green-light to do business with the lucrative Government/Military markets. Leaving the private sector marketplace for Integral and their separate product lines. The arrangement was that their paths were not to cross, and lawsuits would be enforced if they did.

That agreement was made, but as time flowed by, the CTHA was found to be flawed in every sense of the word. Meanwhile, the WiFi market was on the verge of breaching everyone's expectations of the market, and run amok on the world in whole.

IAS, seeing Integral's success wanted a piece of that action. They tried talking at first, but Bill Robinson was having none of that. Then the threats came. Integral ignored them, and pressed on with the next phase of their marketing program for their new Micro-Antenna products.

That was about 5 years ago. Wow, it's hard to believe--that is a long time. 5 or 6 years ago, when Integral, then a small/micro antenna company with a host of good products on hand, was poised to enter and take that--then--niche market by storm.

With the potential for deals in hand, IAS struck.

Shortly before the first deal was signed, IAS issued a lawsuit, claiming that the technology used in Integral's WiFi product was stolen from the CTHA -- Something they new was a blatant untruth.

The court case, which lasted almost 8 months, was resolved in Integral's favor, but WiFi had moved on by then. Were integral to have pushed forward, they would be one among many--with no unique attributes.

Instead--during the legal battle, Integral / Tom Aisenbrey, uncovered the secret to ElectriPlast, and a new corporate path emerged overnight.

That was almost 3 years ago. Since then, Integral has been busy obtaining patents on almost every conceivable use for ElectriPlast. From wires in your car to, well you name it...

It was a good story then, and has emerged into even a better story.

I am not in love with this or any other stock, but I do value the fullness of a story, and this one has the legs to make you believe the gist of what you hear in its regard.

And that is just a very small slice of the whole story. But it may give you a sense as to why I was here then, and why I have kept tabs on the company up to now...

Cheers and best,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 15 July 2006




Once again, words from Tobin Smith causes Inquiring Minds to Seek more Info...



15 July 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Hello: I am always able to track down which stock Tobin Smith refers to. I don't have to subscribe and it's sort of fun when I find it. It was your Blog that put me onto Integral. I will watch it. It's moving today while rest of market is down, probably due to Smith's newsletter.


------------------


Hi there EB Reader,

Good to meet you. Anything I say beyond this point will be hyping the stock, which I do not want to do... Whatever you uncover on your own should be enough to put you on the path to deciding for yourself.

What I do want to note is that we'll be updating the Blog with a couple of new stories this weekend which may be of interest.

In the meantime--if you don't mind--can you tell me how you can track down the stocks TS recommends?

To be honest, I had never heard of him until what, almost 4 months ago, and that word came from a Blog reader who connected the dots on his own and tossed an article my direction. That he is tracking it just brings a synergy to the deal, but since I too do not subscribe to his newsletter, and am curious (and tired of seeing bits an pieces shared by others interested in this company). It would be good to see what he is talking up...

Cheers and best to you,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 18 June 2006




Concern over Past OTC Pump & Dump Burns...



18 June 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Thank you for your earlier timely response. I will be looking forward to your next ElectriPlast Blogpsot post as events unfold this year and beyond. I don't have a very large position in this company, and what I did contribute towards my investment of ITKG was with what little in can spare within my tight budget. This is why I am searching for every tidbit of information I can find. I too, did not have very much luck with IR in receiving any definitive answers and actually was left feeling like I had MORE questions after speaking with their IR representative. If I could receive any positive definitive information, I would quickly double my position with the remaining funds that I can spare.

Unlike many other OTC.BB companies, the amount of patents ITKG holds rights to is staggering. The claim Aisenbrey has about his product makes me wonder why tech companies haven't been scrambling to adopt ElectriPlast into their manufacturing methods.

Is it because ITKG will simply choose not settle until "the price is right?"

I wonder if I took a trip up to Bellingham, if IR would show me a working model of one of their ElectriPlast / Plastenna products. Actually being able to physically see and use one of their prototypes while comparing it to existing technologies would make me a much more confident investor.

Do you know of anyone who has attempted anything of this sort?

I am inclined to think that they wouldn't allow it for a small time investor such as myself, considering how secretive IR seemed to be on the phone with me. Which leads me to my next question:

Why all of the secrecy?

Why is information regarding 'who' they are aligning themselves with such a mystery (excluding the Heatron contract)?

Since Integral's IP is currently protected, what would it hurt to make that information public?

I consider myself a progressive investor and I believe the future holds many exciting developments. I'm fascinated by the opportunities in the unfolding technologies in the other stocks I own hold such as Suntech Power(solar energy), Evergreen Solar, Powershares Wilderhill Clean Energy ETF, Intuitive Surgical (robotic assisted surgery equipment), Exelisis (promising biotech), WiMAX stocks, etc. All of these companies had a much greater amount of information available prior to my plunking money down on their stock, which made me much more confident. Of course, many of these came at the recommendation of Tobin Smith or my Fool.com 'rule breakers ' subscription service.

All of these stocks / ETF's have tons or room to grow as they their market penetration grows over the next decade. My hope is that the same occurs with ITKG. I think one of the greatest things that could happen for this company would be to get out of the OTC.BB range and become listed on the NASDAQ exchange, resulting in a much higher visibility. I believe much more information will need to be released by ITKG before that happens. Warren Buffet once said: "I only invest in what I can understand." To date, the only things that I truly understand are:

(1)Integral's IP presents potential for huge profits in the future.

(2) Tom Aisenbrey's claims are terrific but I've never personally seen or used their product, therefore I do not fully understand it.

(3) Tobin Smith is touting the stock, but I do not know if he has ever personally validated the performance of ElectriPlast-enhanced products, therefore I don't know if he fully understands this company either. It's probably worth noting that Tobin is a multi-millionaire and has a lot more "Vegas Money" than I and can take a substantial hit to his portfolio without blinking.

(4) My thoughts often wonder "why the secrecy?" Their IP is now secured by the patent office.

(5) Although I could hardly claim to be an expert in solar power, robotic assisted surgery, WiMAX applications and biotech, the amount of public information on these other tech companies was much greater, giving me a much better grasp at being able to understand the companies' concepts. It has been almost uncharacteristic of me to invest in a company with so much speculation abound. Again, I'm banking a lot of the reputation of Mr. Smith.

(6) The stock has held strong in the mid 2's range for the past month and half, which leads me to believe there a large number of people feeling more confident, or at least as confident as I do about this company's products. The volume drastically decreased last Friday but no but the price actually increased. I would take that as a good sign since no one sold off when volume decreased. It would lead me to believe most ITKG investors are adopting an accumulate strategy.

My apologies if I've sounded too negative. I'm just very analytical and try to objectively analyze all of my stock picks from both the positive and negative. Also, you're one of the few that I've managed to get any type of intelligent answers from regarding ITKG, as most message boards I visit (such as RagingBull.com) involve people simply belittling one another instead of intelligently attempting to analyze this company's prospects. In the end, the positive indicators still outweigh the near silent secrecy of corporate. I'm still holding and am prepared to hold for a long time.

I just feel that I've worked too hard for my money to invest in an irresponsible manner, and having been burned by a couple other OTC.BB companies, want to be as sure as possible about this one. (I told myself this is the last time I would try investing in an OTC.BB company.) Like I said before, your website / insightful email responses help boost my confidence in this company. I could only wish that IR would begin to follow that trend. Keep up the great work on the website PK!

Regards,


-------------------


Hi again EB Reader,

Your note struck a chord throughout the reading. If you were to call and tell IR that you were in the area and merely wanted to see if the investment was real or not, offering to make an appointment during your stay, I think they very well may accommodate you--but they will probably ask you to sign an NDA (non disclosure agreement) before they showed you anything of value, and explained more about what was on the horizon. Were I there instead of here in Germany--well I would miss out on all of the good beer to be certain--but I would do just that in order to validate my investment and ensure that there was more to it than a fly-by-night penny-stock option...

At least that is what I would want to do...

As for the secrecy, there is a story--I touched upon parts of it in my Blog when I discussed the company's past relationship with IAS Communications, which eventually ended up in a lawsuit. Since that time, Integral's management has had its trust sorely tested by entities exposed to the capabilities of ElectriPlast and the potentials displayed. Think on it this way, one business motto is 'its a dog-eat-dog world'. To this end and as a result of experience, Integral ended up hiring a top notch law firm to represent them. They have aligned themselves with QuanStar as a mediator to push their product and act as a medium between other aggressive companies looking for an advantage in today's marketplace. They also get advice and financing from two strong money market leaders Wells Fargo and Wellington Financial--who itself is invested into the ElectriPlast potential.

In short some of Integral's earlier attempts to market their product through larger named entities backfired. These entities hindered progress (either in hopes that Integral would run out of money and bankrupt itself--or until they could steal Integral's Intellectual Property (IP) from underneath them) all the while smiling in the company management's face and offering assurance after assurance.

You can even look at the attitudes of an number of the questionable, but definitely agenda-biased entities on the RagingBull as an example as to why it would not be wise to share information with such unknowns. What they might do with unique or privileged information in a medium where irresponsible & anonymous interaction is the norm rather than the exception is troublesome. Were one of these individuals to have access to--and take bits and pieces of that information as spread it as truth or as falsehoods for whatever reasons drive them, well, such a scenario in a rumor-driven arena could end up being even more harmful.

Think on it in this light, why do you think Integral chooses to be so secretive--more over, why do you think they are so aggressive on the patenting of their IP.

In short, the management is looking to market their ElectriPlast / Plastenna materials, but in an extremely smart manner, wherein they maintain the maximum control over their product--and at the end of the day, the maximum control over incoming revenues.

It is a thankless position they have put themselves in, but there is a method to the madness.

Unfortunately, I cannot explore this train of thought on the ElectriPlast Blog because--though some of the facts are known--at the end of the day, I will come off as more than a shareholder interested in exploring the good, bad and ugly related to the company. I will end up sounding like a shill, touting the pluses, and with that, my judgment and perspective would be damaged by implication.

Better to let people uncover the facts and reasons for themselves--the facts are indeed out there if you choose to read between the lines. Moreover, if you do have access to the company and can visit, you can present the questions yourself in person, and get point blank response to base your judgments upon.

Although they do not tend to talk bad about existing companies (mainly because there remains a necessity to possibly do business through them) they may detail underlying facts related to a past episode of interest were it done in person. If the response validates what I have noted above, or whatever you uncover on your own, great.

Just keep in mind, the company has made mistakes, but throughout it all, it has learned, adjusted and compensated for their weaknesses or shortcomings--and continues to look forward.

There is a finish line out there. Once the product emerges on the marketplace, and the diversity is truly exposed, you will see that this is not a mere "3-Bagger," and that your investment could be as farsighted as those who initially invested in eBay, Microsoft, AOL, or Starbucks when those companies first came on the scene.

Integral has developed a foundation; they have the advisors and contact people in place; they have marketed their product with some 40 plus companies who have been testing it in-house for their own uses and schemes; they have financing established; they have legal issues covered through Preston Gates Ellis; and finally they are taking care of the supply chain issues (manufactures and material producers who supply the mixed product to those 40 plus companies).

This is the news you would want to watch for over the coming months. After this is firmed and established, the starting gun will sound off, and the race to that finish line will begin.

Granted, that is merely my opinion. But logically speaking, it is the only piece of the puzzle missing at this point.

Once in place, there is absolutely no reason why this rocket would stall. Heck, they have already established chain of command protocols. The team, if they must go anywhere, each travels separately (on different planes, different vehicles, whatever) just to ensure that the dream continues despite the loss of one of its figureheads.

In my honest opinion, they are taking this seriously, I understand your concerns, but I believe what we are watching from the sidelines is real, and the potential explosive...

Alright, enough with the conspiracy theory talk. If you have the chance to pay a visit, I encourage you to call ahead, make an appointment, and do so. If you do, please relay whatever you uncover--as long as it does not conflict what whatever NDA they have you sign...

Cheers and best regards from Bavaria,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 17 June 2006




The "Don King" approach to Marketing ElectriPlast...



17 June 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

First and foremost, I would like to take the time to thank you for what I would consider the most comprehensive website regarding Integral Technologies. You have obviously uncovered more 'stones' than I would've in my own research. I continue receiving 'buy' recommendations from Tobin Smith on Integral on the premise that large contracts are coming within the next two quarters. Now, the latest post on your Blog seems to confirm this.

I just would like to see if I'm interpreting this correctly. As stated in the latest post:

"BR and TA said that there should be “two or three” announcements in the next quarter. (EB Note: One source said “one,” the other said “two” of those company’s are Fortune 100 companies who are located in the “Chicago/NY area.” The latest F-100 listing for those areas list: IBM (NY) #10; Boeing (Chicago) #26; Motorola (Schaumburg, near Chicago) #54; and Honeywell International (Morristown, NJ, near NY) #71. Take your pick, folks. There are also a number of top pharmaceutical companies on the F-100.)"

Does "two or three announcements" mean that revenue producing contracts have been drawn up with one or more fortune 100 companies? Or does this mean that the companies are simply just considering using ElectriPlast for their products?

As always, thanks for your time PK.


-----------------


Hi there EB Reader,

Remember, what was presented was a compilation of reports from those who attended or who heard first-hand from one who was present at this opportune get-together. The task before us was to suss out what was actually said versus what was heard.

I am hopeful that we did a fair job, but because no-one recorded the event and we are relying on memories. There is a margin for error. Still, we put forth the consistent observations given.

As for the EB notes referenced -- at this point, there is no definitive available, and Integral's IR will go to lengths to dissuade my digging further due to the potential chance that I could expose negotiations in progress and possibly cause damage towards that end. What was offered was a logical leap, identifying the regional F100 companies, and narrowing the list down to those who would best benefit from an association with ElectriPlast/Plastenna materials in their present and short term future product lines.

A number of reports noted that the companies involved were readily recognized names -- we took an educated guess with the list we offered, but there are others out there who would also fit the bill.

As for your question - there is a complication in the answer. While it is true, Integral is looking to license use of product, there is a new twist in their approach towards making money which could give them and even better leverage over their IP material, and (us as shareholders) more access and control to the revenues generated.

Although not yet mentioned on the Blog (basically because I do not yet have enough to validate it as a--or rather the--game plan), rather than merely dealing with F100 / F500 companies, BR may be approaching and making deals with Plastic producers and manufactures. In this way, they can control the price, the royalty, and marry up Plastic manufactures with product producers.

Think in terms of Don King. He never fights, but he never leaves the table with empty pockets either.

If this is the game plan Integral's management is working to generate, then--using a boxing theme--not only will they own the talent; they will have a piece of the media-rights and the pay-per-view after event purse to boot.

Hope this was helpful,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 16 June 2006




Reaching out to ITKG Investors -- and Them Reaching Back...



16 June 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

Just wanted to drop you a short note and thank you for your Blog. I first heard about ITKG when a colleague of mine was completing his Masters at the University of Michigan. A project he was working on brought ITKG to his attention.

When I read the letter to the shareholders in January, I jumped in this again @ .42 cents. I've added a couple times since on dips. The investment club I belong to has taken a good position and several others in the group have also. The product and the potential of this product are "mind boggling".

Thanks again, and we appreciate your information.


---------------


Hi there EB Reader,

I'm glad to be of help to you and your investment circle. If you need anything more, please ask.

Cheers and best to you and your club,

PK sends...



Reader Interaction - 13-14 June 2006




Reaching out to ITKG Investors; New, Old, Novice or with a vast depth of Experience and Knowledge...



13-14 June 2006
EB Reader & PK Correspondence


PK,

I am a current shareholder and was not advised of such a meeting ?? In fact I have 30+ thousand in ITKG shares and all the info I can find is off this Blog (Thanks !!)

I would be very appreciative to be included in this information as I am not a wealthy person, but one that sees a great investment opportunity and jumped aboard....hook line and sinker !!

Sincerely,


-----------------------


EB Reader,

Welcome on board, and congratulations on your investment choice.

As for words on the company, there are a few other resources to touch, some manipulative and touting, others useful in their own aspect. There is a gentleman named Tobin Smith who runs a newsletter, he has featured Integral on that medium for the past 3 months. He is a stock analyst, good with charts and has contacts to brokers and finance people--all of whom give him the added insight needed to make the calls he feels comfortable making. The same calls/advice that some people are willing to spend big money, heed and follow.

Me, I am in this because I sense the potential surrounding the product, and have watched the company's management stumble, learn, and grow from the experience.

You have invested at a decent time--during the summer doldrums where the activity may appear to wane, but in fact, behind the scenes action may prove that things will heat up and burst at the seams. This meeting referenced is one aspect of that heating trend. News flow may dry up over the next few weeks as vacations kick in, and decision makers put issues of import on the backburner, but that will not hinder events already initiated.

More will be detailed in coming Blog inserts--I need to fact check some issues and touch base with some willing to share their knowledge on the little known facts taking place in the background.

More than you expected to get -- sorry about that, I was in the middle of a Blog article and some of that bled-over. Suffice it to note, you are in good company. The price per share may have dropped over recent weeks. That could be due to any number of reasons, but the reality is a good foundation is present. The supply chain issues have been resolved, and those companies who are looking to use and sell the ElectriPlast / Plastenna material are working to become first on the market with their moldable products.

Another information source you might touch base with is the company's IR. Look at the website for that number. Though they will be tight lipped in what they release, they will offer niggles of insight which can help to further support your decision to invest.

In the meantime, I and a few others will continue to keep the Blog relevant, but on that front, you can possibly help.

I am working in a fishbowl--being here in Bavaria, and watching this company grow over time. My view is not that of a new investor and the things I might take for granted are of dire concern to someone of that ilk.

If you could remind me at times to keep the volume simple, or better yet, offer a recommendation or two for an area of interest that you would like to see further developed, please do so... If you would like to assist in the effort of sharing enlightenment to other shareholders, by all means, draft up a story or an outline and we'll go from there...

'nuf said, it was great hearing from you -- if you have a need for anything, please feel free to shout.

PK sends...